History of Big Pharma and the Major Players

First-Ever Peer-Reviewed Study of Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Children Shows Vaccinated Kids Have a Higher Rate of Sickness, 470% Increase in Autism



The first-ever, peer-review study has been published comparing total-health in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Dr. Anthony Mawson led a research team that investigated the relationship between vaccination exposures and acute or chronic illnesses in home-schooled children. The vaccinated children had a much higher rate of autism and ADHD, at a rate of 470% higher than those who received no shots.  Vaccinated children were also more vulnerable to allergies and eczema. Unvaccinated children contract mild childhood diseases more frequently, but their vaccinated counterparts suffer pneumonia and ear infections more frequently. The finding that vaccination introduces a significant risk for autism is devastating to the vaccine industry and, therefore, will be vigorously attacked.



https://needtoknow.news/2017/05/first-ev...se-autism/

 

These findings in a study population of 666 children, 261 of whom (39%) were unvaccinated, are sure to stir controversy, in part because it is the first of its kind. The scientific literature on the long-term effects of the vaccination program is virtually silent. Most studies on the safety of vaccines only consider immediate or short-term effects. There was no obvious explanation for the differences in health outcomes observed between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups of children other than vaccination itself.



The finding that vaccination is a significant risk for autism is the most explosive finding in the paper. For well over a decade, parents concerned that vaccines were involved in autisms sharp rise have been calling for what has long been labelled the vax/unvax study. Public health officials such as Paul Offit have resisted these calls with claims that a comparative study of autism risk and other health outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated children would be retrospectively impossible and prospectively unethical.



http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/05/pilot...ldren.html

This is interesting!

Toddlers on Amphetamine: History of Big Pharma and the Major Players (Full Documentary)

This is Era of Wisdom’s first full length documentary, “Toddlers on Amphetamine: History of Big Pharma and the Major Players.” It documents the full history of allopathic medicine, the hidden history of what we call “big pharma,” and how the world generally came to be the way it is today. It examines the history of chemicals, poison in particular, disease, power, and psychopathy.

https://ugetube.com/watch/toddlers-on-am...76tpL.html


http://www.eraofwisdom.org/

Thalidomide victims say drug company's apology is an insult

Grünenthal Group's apology to victims of morning sickness drug 'meaningless without financial compensation'

The Grünenthal Group released a statement on Friday stating that it "regrets" the consequences of the drug, which led to babies being born without limbs during the 1950s and 1960s.

But the apology was dismissed by Thalidomide Agency UK, which represents people affected by the drug in Britain, as "insufficient". The Grünenthal Group needed to "put their money where their mouth is" rather than simply express regret, the charity's head consultant, Freddie Astbury, said.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012...ug-apology

You'll find the same entities involved in this thread also.

https://communication-breakdown.com/mybb...of-control

Big pharma is connected to it all. Control the medical practices and minds of doctors and you control the world.

This video certainly strikes a nerve OP. Liars cheating and poisoning people for profit. Such a rancid disease. It needs to be irradiated. The paperclippers of the past are not the great men we all heard about in school. Their works are continuing to destroy human beings in so many ways. All for the glory of profit.





Thanks for the find.

Thalidomide victims say drug company's apology is an insult
 
Grünenthal Group's apology to victims of morning sickness drug 'meaningless without financial compensation'

The Grünenthal Group released a statement on Friday stating that it "regrets" the consequences of the drug, which led to babies being born without limbs during the 1950s and 1960s.

But the apology was dismissed by Thalidomide Agency UK, which represents people affected by the drug in Britain, as "insufficient". The Grünenthal Group needed to "put their money where their mouth is" rather than simply express regret, the charity's head consultant, Freddie Astbury, said.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012...ug-apology

Sickening behavior! Don't forget about the Ritalin kids. Their brains shrink and they're mental issues increase with age.

Ideas of DNA and genetics are important to consider. At its heart is the idea of eugenics. Early 20th century minds began making the tools to selectively destroy those whom aren't considered proper human beings. Mental health issues, class, pauperism, race, creed...

Bombing the Mind, The Pentagons Drug War

In The Futurological Congress (1971), Polish writer Stanislaw Lem portrayed a future in which disobedience is controlled with hypothetical mind-altering chemicals dubbed “benignimizers. Lems fictional work opens with the frightening story of a police and military biochemical attack on protesters outside of an international scientific convention. As the environment becomes saturated with hallucinogenic agents, in Lems tale the protesters (and bystanders) descend into chaos, overcome by delusions and feelings of complacency, self-doubt, and even love.
 
If the Pentagons Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) has its way, Lem may be remembered as a prophet.

The Advantages and Limitations of Calmatives for Use as a Non-Lethal Technique, a 49 page report obtained last week by the Sunshine Project under US information freedom law, has revealed a shocking Pentagon program that is researching psychopharmacological weapons. Based on “extensive review conducted on the medical literature and new developments in the pharmaceutical industry, the report concludes that the development and use of [psychopharmacological weapons] is achievable and desirable. These mind-altering weapons violate international agreements on chemical and biological warfare as well as human rights. Some of the techniques discussed in the report have already been used by the US in the “War on Terrorism.

Failed Drugs: The report points out that pharmaceutical candidates that fail because of excessive side-effects might be desirable for use as weapons: Often, an unwanted side-effect will terminate the development of a promising new pharmaceutical compound. However, in the variety of situations in which non-lethal techniques are used, there may be less need to be concerned with unattractive side-effects Perhaps, the ideal calmative has already been synthesized and is awaiting renewed interest from its manufacturer.
 
http://www.counterpunch.org/2002/07/02/b...-drug-war/