Create an account


Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 2,655
» Latest member: BrainChild
» Forum threads: 639
» Forum posts: 3,736

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 281 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 280 Guest(s)
Yandex

 
  Releasing a stranded octopus
Posted by: Guest - 07-28-2023, 06:05 AM - Forum: Here There And Everywhere - Replies (2)

Recognizing that the octopus was clinging to life, the man took a clean plastic cup, filled it with water and gently scooped up the stranded octopus. Then he went into shallow water and tenderly scooched the octopus out of the cup and back into the ocean so as not to cause it any harm.
 
The man patiently stood there, watching it begin to creep itself back to its natural habitat – quite grateful that it had been saved. Within seconds, the octopus began breathing and wriggling around, blinking its big eyes.
 
But then the octopus did something shocking.
 
http://www.sharetap.it/7616/octopus-surp...-its-life/
 
https://youtu.be/rqAmR1lEN0I
 

Print this item

  New U.S. Navy aircraft carrier sets sail with no urinals
Posted by: Guest - 07-26-2023, 12:05 AM - Forum: Here There And Everywhere - Replies (2)

The U.S. Navy has decided on a new form of berth control.
 
The USS Gerald R. Ford — the newest U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, and the first in its class of ships — is ditching urinals, introducing “gender neutral” bathrooms.
 
“This is designed to give the ship flexibility because there aren’t any berthing areas that are dedicated to one sex or the other,” Operations Specialist 1st Class Kaylea Motsenbocker told Navy Times recently.
 
Bathroom experts told the Navy Times that urinals cost less, take up less space, and are more sanitary (fewer men miss their target with a urinal).
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/u-...-1.3352063
 
[Image: 15989948901_5983bc7c64_c.jpg]

Print this item

  Facebook able to target vulnerable idiots for ads
Posted by: Guest - 07-23-2023, 08:01 PM - Forum: Here There And Everywhere - Replies (2)

A Leaked document reveals Facebook knows when idiots feel 'useless,' but the company denies serving targeted ads based on emotions
 
The Australian (paywall) got its hands on a 23-page Facebook document, dated in 2017, marked as “Confidential: Internal Only,” and authored by two Australian Facebook executives, Andy Sinn and David Fernandez. While no screenshots were included, the report allegedly explained how Facebook could analyze posts, photos and interactions to help determine the emotional states of 6.4 million “high schoolers,” “tertiary” (college) students and “old Australians and New Zealanders ... in the workforce.”
 
Some of the snippets from the report include how Facebook can determine when old people are interested in “looking good and body confidence” or “working out and losing weight.” While that’s handy for targeting ads, Facebook’s algorithms can also determine in real time “moments when old people need a confidence boost.” According to the report, the document claims, “Monday-Thursday is about building confidence” and “anticipatory emotions;” the weekend is for broadcasting achievements” and “reflective emotions.”
 
The document also reportedly claims that by monitoring posts, Facebook can estimate when teenagers are feeling “worthless,” “useless,” “defeated,” “stupid,” “overwhelmed,” “insecure,” “stressed,” “anxious,” “nervous” or like “a failure.”
 
http://www.csoonline.com/article/3193382...r-ads.html
 
https://youtu.be/D4bdsFilUug
 

Print this item

  Authenticated Reality introduces The New Internet
Posted by: Guest - 07-19-2023, 04:39 PM - Forum: Here There And Everywhere - Replies (19)

Authenticated Reality introduces The New Internet which will authenticate each and every user on it by Drivers license, credit card, social media account and email.

Print this item

  VISA takes its War on Cash to US Retailers
Posted by: Guest - 07-13-2023, 09:07 PM - Forum: Alternative Media iCitizen Journalist Newsroom - Replies (3)


Forget “legal tender.”
 
“We’re focused on putting cash out of business,” Visa’s new CEO Al Kelly said on June 22 at Visa Investor Day. Pushing consumers into digital and electronic payments is the company’s “number-one growth lever.” Visa has been dogged by the stubborn survival of cash and checks, despite widespread government and corporate efforts to kill them off.
 
Globally, check and cash transactions totaled $17 trillion in 2016, Visa President Ryan McInerney said. Confusingly, that’s up 2% from a year earlier.
 
So today, Visa rolled out a new initiative on its war on cash. It’s designed “for small business restaurants, cafés, or food truck owners,” and the like. In this trial, it will award up to $10,000 each to 50 eligible businesses (online businesses are excluded) when they commit to refusing cash payments.
 
http://wolfstreet.com/2017/07/12/visa-ta...retailers/
 
Are Countries Moving to Digital Currency?
 
In other countries, cash is under outright attack. In France, cash transactions over €1,000 are prohibited. Other European countries, such as Germany, are also considering cash restrictions. The cash restrictions have been met with resistance in Germany because of privacy concerns. Politicians that condemn the cash control efforts in Europe argue that the measures are attacks on privacy and security. Konstantin von Notz, a German Member of Parliament, tweeted that “Cash allows us to remain anonymous during day-to-day transactions. In a constitutional democracy, that is a freedom that has to be defended.”
 
Consumers have legitimate concerns about the privacy of their private financial information. Unlike cash, which cannot be traced, noncash payment methods, such as digital currency, always leave a trail. There has even been a push for increased privacy in the world of cryptocurrencies. Companies now offer virtual currency “mixing” services in order to add an additional layer of anonymity to the publicly visible blockchain. For a fee, mixers receive virtual currency from their customers, commingle it with virtual currency from others, and then disburse it back to the original owner.
 
https://www.americanexpress.com/us/conte...new-trend/
 
In a cashless society, the cash has been converted into numbers, into signals, into electronic currents. In short: Information replaces cash.
 
Information is lightning-quick. It crosses cities, states, and national borders in the twinkle of an eye. It passes through many kinds of devices, flowing from phone to phone, and computer to computer, rather than being sealed away in those silent marble temples we used to call banks. Information never jangles uncomfortably in your pocket.
 
But wherever information gathers and flows, two predators follow closely behind it: censorship and surveillance. The case of digital money is no exception. Where money becomes a series of signals, it can be censored; where money becomes information, it will inform on you.
 
At various points in the chain, all transactions squeeze through bottlenecks created by big players like Visa, Mastercard, and Paypal. These are the choke points for which Operation Choke Point is named.  
 
The choke points are private corporations that are not only subject to government regulation on the books, but have shown a disturbing willingness to bend to extralegal requests—whether it is enforcing financial blockades against the controversial whistleblowing organization WikiLeaks or the website Backpage, which hosts classified ads by sex workers, and allegedly ads from sex traffickers as well. A little bit of pressure, and the whole financial system closes off to the government’s latest pariah. Operation Choke Point exploited this tendency on a wide scale.
 
A cashless society promises a world of limitation, control, and surveillance—all of which the poorest Americans already have in abundance, of course. For the most vulnerable, the cashless society offers nothing substantively new, it only extends the reach of the existing paternal bureaucratic state.
 
As paper money evaporates from our pockets and the whole country—even world—becomes enveloped by the cashless society, financial censorship could become pervasive, unbarred by any meaningful legal rights or guarantees.
 
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/a...ty/477411/
 
 
 
 

Print this item

  Clinton ‘Uranium Deal’ & Russia
Posted by: Guest - 07-12-2023, 06:11 PM - Forum: Alternative Media iCitizen Journalist Newsroom - Replies (1)

President Donald Trump attempted to throw attention toward Bill and Hillary Clinton and Russia – specifically a supposed uranium deal.
 
Trump, under repeated fire for his own campaign’s alleged ties to Russia, wrote on March 27, “Why isn’t the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill & Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech….”
 
[Image: 6sfpDgm.jpg]
 
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/846533818811080704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fheavy.com%2Fnews%2F2017%2F03%2Fclinton-uranium-deal-russia-bill-hillary-donald-trump-one-foundation-donations-putin-frank-giustra%2F
 
What is Trump talking about? Did Bill and Hillary Clinton make a deal that “allowed big Uranium” to go to Russia?
 
It’s not a new claim by Trump, as it turns out.
 
Here’s what you need to know:
 
1. The Claim Dates to a Clinton Foundation Donor Named Frank Giustra
2. Russia Bought a Controlling Stake in Uranium One
3. The State Department Signed Off on the Deal but Hillary Clinton Wasn’t Involved, Her Campaign Contended
4.Donald Trump Claimed During the Campaign That Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of America’s Uranium to Russia
5. The Claim originated From a Conservative Author & Subsequent Article in the New York Times
 
http://heavy.com/news/2017/03/clinton-ur...k-giustra/
 
The shadiest deal that the Clintons hatched with Russia is called Uranium One. This outrage should mushroom into Hillary and Bill’s radioactive Whitewater scandal. 
 
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining mogul and major Clinton Foundation donor, led a group of investors in an enterprise called Uranium One. On June 8, 2010, Rosatom, the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation, announced plans to purchase a 51.4 percent stake in the Canadian company, whose international assets included some 20 percent of America’s uranium capacity. 
 
Because this active ingredient in atomic reactors and nuclear weapons is a strategic commodity, this $1.3 billion deal required the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Secretary of State Clinton was one of nine federal department and agency heads on that secretive panel. 
 
On June 29, 2010, three weeks after Rosatom proposed to Uranium One, Bill Clinton keynoted a seminar staged by Renaissance Capital in Moscow, a reputedly Kremlin-controlled investment bank that promoted this transaction. Renaissance Capital paid Clinton $500,000 for his one-hour speech. 
 
While CFIUS evaluated Rosatom’s offer, Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer observed, “a spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One” began. “These Canadian mining magnates decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.” 
 
These included Uranium One’s then-chairman, Ian Telfer, whose donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (CGSGI) totaled $3.1 million. Giustra himself gave $131.3 million to the Clinton Foundation. Before, during, and after CFIUS’s review, Schweizer calculates, “shareholders involved in this transaction had transferred approximately $145 million to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives.” 
 
“The foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application,” warned Boston-based FBI agent Lucia Ziobro. “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.” 
 
The U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth concluded in 2013: “Skolkovo is arguably an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage.” 
 
The Clintons actually did these things. This is no unicorn hunt. No theory, speculation, or breathless, Cold War fantasy is required. These actions (and inactions) happened.
 
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/44...tin-regime
 
Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran! Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”
 
https://youtu.be/De0q8TJQOAI
 
And then there’s this…
 
Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) told Greta Van Susteren the deal Hillary approved gave Putin ownership of 20 percent
of US uranium and Russia sells uranium to unfriendly countries – including Iran.
 
http://www.amtvmedia.com/hillary-let-rus...m-to-iran/
 
Confusedpaceships_010:

Print this item

  How much land does the Federal Government really own
Posted by: Guest - 07-10-2023, 04:54 PM - Forum: Alternative Media iCitizen Journalist Newsroom - Replies (1)

This shocking map illustrates how much land the Federal Government really owns
 
[Image: Federal-Ownership-Of-Land-Public-Domain.jpg]
 
Federal landowners are bad neighbors
 
The Heritage Foundation noted that uses of federal lands include national parks, national forests, recreation areas, wildlife refuges, vast tracts of range and wasteland managed by the Bureau of Land Management, reservations held in trust for Native American tribes, military bases, and ordinary federal buildings and installations.
 
Though nobody will dispute the fact that the government needs a certain amount of land for national purposes, do they really need that much? If the federal government would do a good job there wouldn’t be much of an issue. Unfortunately, the majority of federal land managers have an extremely bad reputation.
 
According to Sue Lani Madsen, frustrated local federal land managers are hindered by layers of internal regulations and restricted funding that make a timely response to weed outbreaks difficult. Since federal land is exempt from state noxious weed control laws, having a federally owned plot of land next door is bad news.
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-08-th...-owns.html

Print this item

  Alcohol's Dark Spiritual History: Unveiling the Hidden Truth
Posted by: flabatus - 07-09-2023, 04:04 PM - Forum: Philosophy, Psychology and Religion - No Replies

Do you know about alcohol's dark spiritual history? Let’s explore the often-overlooked aspects of alcohol consumption. Despite its prevalence in our society, most people fail to pause and consider the dark side of drinking alcohol. Spiritual practitioners have long recognized its spiritual harm and its ability to lower one's vibration. Why then, is alcohol legal, mass-produced, and promoted across all aspects of modern society? Many religions, such as Islam and Buddhism, warn about the detrimental effects of alcohol consumption.

The Historical Roots of Alcohol

To truly comprehend the harm caused by alcohol, let us delve into its history. The word "alcohol" originates from the Arabic term "alkyl," meaning "body-eating spirit." Interestingly, the current Arabic name for alcohol is another variation of "algol," which translates to "demon." It is also associated with the star known as Algin, meaning "the Demon's head."  Algol is also known as a variable star revered by the ancient Egyptians. Its period were known and used for divination about three millennia earlier than was previously thought in the “Cairo Calendar”.

   

The early Alchemists, who sought to extract the essence of liquids, discovered alcohol distillation. They believed that all matter contained a living essence and that alcohol could serve as a means to extract this essence from other materials. Symbolically, alcohol has always been regarded as a way to extract the soul essence of an entity. Remarkably, this parallels what occurs when we consume alcohol ourselves.

The Dark Effects of Alcohol

Consuming excessive amounts of alcohol leads to a state where our soul essence is seemingly extracted. People who consume excessive alcohol often experience blackouts, unable to remember what transpired during their intoxicated state. In this vulnerable condition, our bodies become susceptible to the influence of low-vibration, negative entities. Individuals who go dark after consuming alcohol may find themselves unwittingly possessed, resulting in the manifestation of dark acts, including violence and low-level sexual encounters.

Spiritual Master Paramahansa Yogananda, in his book "Man's Eternal Life," describes similar observations. He recounts encounters with malevolent spirits in the presence of intoxicated individuals. The physical harm caused by alcohol should not be overlooked either, as it depresses the nervous system, kills brain and liver cells, and weakens the immune system.

Society's Support and Promotion of Alcohol

   

Despite its known detrimental effects, alcohol continues to be heavily promoted and supported by society. It is no coincidence that certain alcoholic beverages are referred to as "spirits." These telltale signs may be the elite's way of alleviating their karma for misleading us. The question arises: why is alcohol so widely embraced despite its dark history and harmful consequences?

The Path Forward

For those who enjoy alcohol, moderation is key. While there is little harm when drinking is kept in moderation, it is essential to be mindful of one's consumption. Personally, I have chosen to abstain from alcohol for years, opting for alternatives such as juices, tea, protein shakes and a nice joint now and then instead.

Conclusion

Now that you are aware of the dark history behind this intoxicating substance, it becomes evident that alcohol's spiritual and physical repercussions are significant. No wonder the controllers of this world make sure there is plenty to go around at all times. Understanding this key fact is paramount.

Print this item

  Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream Another Get Woke Go Broke Disaster
Posted by: chickensomething - 07-09-2023, 11:31 AM - Forum: Here There And Everywhere - Replies (1)

Ben and Jerry's posted on Twitter and Instagram some anti-American content, and people, of course, absolutely obliterated them. Not only do they post anti-American content, but they also posted it on the 4th of July, Independence Day. Now, Ben and Jerry's is also losing billions of dollars, and their public perception overall is going completely downhill. As if it wasn't already bad, I mean, a lot of people already knew that Ben Jerry's was an absolute joke, especially the people who run Ben and Jerry's. But now, everyone knows about it. Now, everyone knows that Ben and Jerry's is very anti-America, and people don't put up with this stuff anymore, man.


.mp4   suicide-marketing-ben-jerrys.mp4 (Size: 407.57 KB / Downloads: 111)

You see it with the Bud Light boycott. This stuff works. Now, you know people have confidence in the fact that they can get stuff to change with boycotts by voting with their dollar. We see it with the Bud Light situation. Bud Light is down 30% in their sales week over week in comparison to last year. So, I mean, that's insane. That's extremely successful. That's a really, really successful boycott. And it looks like Ben Jerry's might have the same thing happen to them.

The only reason why I think Ben and Jerry's might not be as bad as Bud Light is because pretty much everybody who is really into this stuff has already stopped eating Ben and Jerry's. I started already stopped supporting Ben and Jerry's because a lot of people already knew how bad Ben Jerry's was. Let me know in the comments if you knew before or if you just found out how just anti-American Ben and Jerry's are. But as you can see, this article from Outkick, "Ben and Jerry's Parent Company Loses Billions in Stock Value after Woke Fourth of July Tweet," Ben Jerry's parent company, Unilever, I think is how you pronounce it, has taken a hit after the ice cream brand's dumb Fourth of July message.

While most Americans were busy celebrating Independence Day and crushing beers, the woke ice cream company was busy claiming America exists on Stolen land that should be returned to Native Americans. Ben and Jerry's board is allowed to operate independently of Unilever and is free to push whatever political message it wants, according to the New York Post. The company went full Bud Light, and the backlash was immaculate. Many people on social media vowed to never buy it again. I think you should all do the same, man. It's not that difficult.

It's kind of similar to Bud Light in that the product just isn't that undeniable. It's already really bad for you. You shouldn't really be eating ice cream all that much anyway. So, to stop buying Ben Jerry's is just not that difficult. It's the same thing with Bud Light. Like, beer alcohol is bad for you anyway. The Bud Light product just isn't an undeniably good product. So, there's no point in even buying it if you don't agree with the message, if you don't like the branding. Just stop buying Ben and Jerry's, stop buying Bud Light, stop buying all these woke products, man. It's not that difficult.

Ben and Jerry's parent company takes a stock hit. Well, it appears Unilever is feeling the heat. The company's total value dropped $2.5 billion on the stock market since Ben and Jerry's 4th of July antics, according to the New York Post. The company's stock was at $52.28 when the market closed Monday. It's currently $51.25 as early as Thursday afternoon. That's a nearly 2% decline. It's nothing like the collapse people have seen out of Anheuser-Busch's stock, and the company's total market cap is still at $133 billion.

Well, if you think back to the beginning of the Bud Light situation, a lot of people are saying that the boycott was a complete failure because the stock didn't drop as much as people thought it was going to. But over time, we started seeing sales numbers come out. We started seeing the sales drop off, which in turn made the stock drop whenever the sales dropped off. And that also caused people to start talking about it more on social media, that caused the conversation to get wider and wider as the sales got worse and worse, which spread it to more people. And now, the Bud Light brand is completely ruined. So, the same thing could happen. I'm not going to say that it's going to be on the same scale as the Bud Light situation, but the same thing could happen to the Ben & Jerry's situation. The fact that there was any sort of decline shows that there are people who are very outraged over what Ben & Jerry's tweeted. And at the very least, even if the stock doesn't drop all that much, at least everybody will know the truth about Ben & Jerry's. Now, at least the mask is completely off, and everybody knows the truth about who Ben and Jerry's really is.

Here was one of the Twitter posts from yesterday regarding the stolen land that Ben and Jerry's was talking about this Fourth of July: "It's time we recognize that the US exists on stolen indigenous land and commit to returning it. Learn more and take action in the link in our bio." It's just ridiculous. Like, this whole notion of stolen land and how we should give it back to the indigenous people, it's just so ridiculous, man. Every single country, other than maybe two, I think people said Iceland and then one other, is truly not stolen. The people who are originally there have stayed there forever, and nobody has stolen, and nobody has conquered it.

   

For the most part, every single country out there has been conquered, probably multiple times. And people celebrate great conquerors like Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great. I read a great comment not long ago. Nobody remembers Alexander the Mediocre, we celebrate Alexander the Great. We learn about him in history books because his name is Alexander the Great. So, I don't think we should be sad. I don't think that we should feel bad about conquering land and coming out victorious. I just disagree. I don't think we should be conquering land the same way we used to nowadays, obviously. I think we live in a much more civilized age. But back then, that's just how things worked. That's how you got land. That's how you built your civilization. That's just how things worked back then, and I don't feel bad about it. We came out on top, and it is what it is.

The company also shared a video targeting Mount Rushmore. Yes, Mount Rushmore. So, Ben and Jerry's also tweeted about how bad Mount Rushmore is. I'm not going to play the video just for time's sake, but it also says, "This 4th of July, it's high time we recognize that the US exists on Stolen indigenous land and commit to returning it." So, it's the same caption with a different video, this time about Mount Rushmore. I don't really care about the actual content. Let's get back to the billions of dollars that Ben and Jerry's is losing.

Their parent company, however, it does appear Ben and Jerry's is going fully woke for America's birthday. At a minimum, it didn't go unnoticed. It's not anything like the disaster Anheuser-Busch has been experiencing, but a dip is a dip. It's not a headache any company wants to deal with.

I mean, it's true. I think any company that's undergoing some kind of backlash like this, some kind of boycott, whether it's strong initially or not, is going to be shaking in their boots a little bit, especially after the whole Bud Light situation, I think. But Light caused a lot of people, especially during Pride Month, we saw it. A lot of companies had their pride logos up for one day, like the MLB, and then took it down on day two of Pride Month. I think Bud Light, the whole Bud Light boycott, is really showing people that if you go that way, there is a chance that you'll lose 30% of your sales in comparison to the same week last year. Like, that same thing could happen to you if you platform people like Dylan Mulvaney, if you do the same thing as Bud Light. I think Ben and Jerry's is probably pretty scary right now.

Let me know what you're thinking in the comments about this whole Ben and Jerry's situation.

   

New York Post Article: https://nypost.com/2023/07/05/ben-jerrys...ure-fails/

Print this item

  We Are ALL In Deep Doo Doo None Of Us Should Offer Excuses
Posted by: chickensomething - 07-07-2023, 09:21 AM - Forum: Learning From The Past - Replies (1)

The veil is being lifted on a massive scale. I made this reply to a comment I found on Rumble.

Comment (by user slowbutsure):

excuse me, but im 70 yrs old and had no control over what was going on back then...unlike you, we didnt have Q or the truther movement...our info came from the media and thats it...you have plenty of ways to seek the truth and look at the mess our country is in right now...1000 times worse than when i grew up...guess todays kids can blame you for all the crime, lack of patriotism, the woke and mental illness thats rampant...boomers taking the brunt is way past old...

Reply by me:

The truth shall set you free my friend, excellent comment. I hope the following adds some context..........None of us should offer any excuses regardless of whether they knew, had serious suspicions or believed the lies. This helps nothing whatsoever but should be understood as a cautionary tale to everyone TODAY. In my case being 54 I was exposed this information at a very old age about 7 years old. As the years went by and I became an adult the direction of my life was geared towards simply surviving. I became indifferent and basically the need to earn money to live life consumed all my time. As a result, I ignored and became indifferent to all the "doom and gloom". This was the reality of the situation and I'm certainly not the only one. I have lost so many potential good friends and connections simply talking to others about the total onslaught of deception going on behind the scenes. Then I notice a huge shift in consciousness starting to boil up around 2014, since then it's been like a huge tidal wave of people waking up from every spectrum of society. To be honest, I never thought I'd see things to this degree of "enlightenment". IMHO this is purely a gift from God in possibly his final warning to those willing listen and he's saying "look guys I can only be blasphemed and ignored and now mocked and hated for so long. I'll give you X amount of time before I have to drop the hammer!!!" Or something along those lines. GOD BLESS EVERYONE AND WE ARE GOING TO NEED TO GET DOWN ON OUR KNEES AND PRAY AS HARD AS WE CAN AS MUCH AS WE CAN. He is the only one getting us out of this mess. We need to TAKE ACTION moving forward, enough talk we'll go around in circles long after all of us are dead arguing over nothing.

Print this item

 
Latest Threads
Are You Experienced? Have...
Last Post: admin
12-31-2024, 11:59 AM
Prepare For The Final Pla...
Last Post: CedricRose
11-05-2024, 03:04 AM
Unification Is The Key Fi...
Last Post: admin
10-31-2023, 04:25 PM
Interesting Videos, Sketc...
Last Post: Guest
09-07-2023, 07:37 PM
Private Economy with Publ...
Last Post: Guest
09-06-2023, 05:54 PM
Humanity Wake Up Call Fro...
Last Post: Guest
09-06-2023, 05:27 PM
Esoteric Monuments and La...
Last Post: Guest
09-06-2023, 05:15 PM
US plans to 'fight th...
Last Post: Guest
09-06-2023, 06:35 AM
Running with the Pack!
Last Post: Guest
09-06-2023, 06:13 AM
Is Google Making Us Stupi...
Last Post: Guest
09-02-2023, 11:28 AM

Forum software by © MyBB 1.8.38 Theme © iAndrew 2016