Scientific Racism: The Eugenics of Social Darwinism

 

 

The problem with this structure is the king rats don't really play fair. They gather all the resources and power unto themselves then proceed to dictate who gets what. Fair competition for these crumbs becomes stunted. Leaving the little ones without any form of real empathy for each other. The projection from top of the pyramid doesn't allow for fair competition. Only amongst themselves. Even then, when one of them falls, the rest will come in and eat the weak link whole. When others see how the engine works and decides to build one for themselves the rat kings send out their little minion believers too pound the independent one into submission. 

 

It's nice to be at the top of the food chain.
 

US Scientists Just Edited a Human Embryo for the First Time. (Yes, People Are Freaking Out.)
 
For the first known time in the United States, scientists used a gene-editing technique called CRISPR to modify early-stage human embryos, according to a report published Wednesday in MIT Technology Review.
 
Since the development several years ago of CRISPR, a tool that allows scientists to change sequences of DNA within a cell, scientists have speculated about its potential to free families of genetic disease or stop the spread of other diseases like malaria, among other possibilities. But the technology also raises major ethical questions.
 
Right now, scientists are supposed to stick to editing disease-causing genes. But the technology opens up the possibility of editing genes for “enhancement”—allowing parents to edit for certain kinds of physical and behavioral characteristics in their children. Darnovsky worries that this would usher in an era of genetic discrimination. “That would be layering new forms of inequality and discrimination onto the ones we already live with,” she said.
 
Is this legal?
 
Probably. In 2015, Congress passed a law forbidding the Food and Drug Administration from reviewing applications for germline editing of human embryos, meaning no clinical trials can move forward with FDA funding. We don’t yet know how Mitalipov funded his project, but assuming it was funded privately, it’s perfectly legal. 
 
That wouldn’t be the case in many other countries. The Center for Genetics and Society reports that over 40 countries, “including most with established biotech sectors, have established legal prohibitions on germline modification for human reproduction.” An international treaty also prohibits it. The United States has no such policy.
 
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017...aking-out/
 

Darwinism describes racism to a T. One supreme species to designate the rest accordingly. 

Then it looks like every group has their own sense of superiority...