12-29-2022, 10:59 PM
Forty years ago this month Network was released to widespread acclaim. But its shocking satire turned out to be eerily prescient, writes Nicholas Barber.
Â
Network was their furious howl of protest. It was a triumphant black comedy, winning four Oscars, being nominated for two more, and going on to be held in ever higher acclaim. In 2006, the Writers Guilds of America chose Chayevksyââ¬â¢s screenplay as one of the 10 best in cinema history. Last year, BBC Cultureââ¬â¢s criticsââ¬â¢ poll of the 100 best American films ranked Network at 73.
Â
But is it really ââ¬Åperfectly outrageousââ¬Â? Itââ¬â¢s easy to believe that, in 1976, Chayevsky and Lumetââ¬â¢s bleak view of televisionââ¬â¢s crassness and irresponsibility was deeply shocking. But the scary thing about re-watching Network today is that even its wildest flights of fancy no longer seem outrageous at all. The film was so accurate in its predictions that its most far-fetched satirical conceits have become so familiar as to be almost quaint.
Â
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_a...old-movie/
Â
Network was their furious howl of protest. It was a triumphant black comedy, winning four Oscars, being nominated for two more, and going on to be held in ever higher acclaim. In 2006, the Writers Guilds of America chose Chayevksyââ¬â¢s screenplay as one of the 10 best in cinema history. Last year, BBC Cultureââ¬â¢s criticsââ¬â¢ poll of the 100 best American films ranked Network at 73.
Â
But is it really ââ¬Åperfectly outrageousââ¬Â? Itââ¬â¢s easy to believe that, in 1976, Chayevsky and Lumetââ¬â¢s bleak view of televisionââ¬â¢s crassness and irresponsibility was deeply shocking. But the scary thing about re-watching Network today is that even its wildest flights of fancy no longer seem outrageous at all. The film was so accurate in its predictions that its most far-fetched satirical conceits have become so familiar as to be almost quaint.
Â
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/no_a...old-movie/